I realized my VLC was broke some point in the week after updating Arch. I spend time troubleshooting then find a forum post with replies from an Arch moderator saying they knew it would happen and it’s my fault for not wanting to read through pages of changelogs. Another mod post says they won’t announce that on the RSS feed either. I thought I was doing good by following the RSS but I guess that’s not enough.

I’ve been happily using Arch for 5 years but after reading those posts I’ve decided to look for a different distro. Does anyone have recommendations for the closest I can get to Arch but with a different attitude around updating?

  • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Maybe it’s me, but while you have outlined the events that got you to this point, I don’t understand either the ‘attitude’ you find problematic or what it is about Arch you would hope to find elsewhere. Hard to make a recommendation without those.

    • makeitwonderful@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’re right, I was leaning heavily on the events to give context for defining the attitude (maybe policy would be a less loaded word for me to use). I don’t like the expectation that I would have to look for information in multiple places before updating. I’d prefer to be able to update often without needing to take in a lot of information.

      • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If your upgrade says anything out of the ordinary, which it most definitely did here, that should probably trigger something in you. This is the case for any distro.