• enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    What I’ve seen of rustdesk so far is that it’s absolutely not even close to the options available for X. It replaces TeamViewer, not thin clients.

    You would need the following to get viability in my eyes:

    • Multiple users per server (~50 users)
    • Enterprise SSO authentication, working kerberos on desktop
    • Good and easily deployable native clients for Windows, Linux and Mac, plus html5 client
    • Performant headless software rendered desktops
    • GPU acceleration possible but not required
    • Clustering, HA control plane, load balancing
    • Configuration management available

    This isn’t even an edge case. Current and upcoming regulations on information security drags the entire industry this way. Medical, research, defence, banking, basically every regulated landscape gets easier to work in when going down this route. Close to zero worries about endpoint security. Microsoft is working hard on this. It’s easy to do with X. And the best thing on Wayland is RustDesk? As stated earlier, these issues were brought up and discarded as FUD in 2008, and here we are.

    Wayland isn’t a better replacement, after 15 years it’s still not a replacement. The Wayland implementations certainly haven’t been rushed, but the architecture was. At this point, fucking Arcan will be viable before Wayland.