• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    For unknown reporters we might see a future where a demoable POC is attached to the issue, so it can be verified as not a hallucinogen… To be fair there are real issues that can’t be demoed, but this cover most of the slop

    • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      There’s two levels to this. You have big tech trying to prove that their AI is capable of contributing positively and then you also have little people who with the best of intentions are trying to bug fix but don’t have the skills. Both will become more prevalent.

      • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yes, but I mean exactly this headline with this contents article. Someone submitted something very badly ai generated to the curl hackerone and the curl team complains.

  • Luffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Article about hating QI Slop

    AI Slop Picture as Headline

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Underneath the image is the credit:

      Credit: Aurich Lawson | Getty Images

      I think Getty Images has banned the submission of AI content

    • Beryl@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Are you sure about that? If I remember correctly, Aurich (the guy that does all the graphics at Ars Technica) isn’t fond of AI. This looks more like a Photoshop job to me.