• Ethan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Assembly languages are always architecture specific. Thats kind of their defining feature. Assembly is readable machine code.

    • h4x0r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      nasm is an assembler though, not a ‘languages’, that only supports x86/x64. gas for example supports a wide range of architectures so you can write risc-v, arm, x64, etc.

      • MasterNerd@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The reason I used the nasm logo is because Assembly itself doesn’t have a logo since it’s not really one language. This is the one I’m with the most familiar with so that’s the one I used. This meme would apply to any Assembly language.