• Gxost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Nah, I was excited to read about the algorithmic change, but it turned out to be an obvious change. I would replace nested loops with a map too. The result is impressive, though.

    • drspod@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      Marketing departments love to make a huge deal out of this kind of thing, because they only see the big number improvement and don’t really understand that this was just some dev’s Wednesday afternoon.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        Well it’s a 70 times improvement so the developer gets a 70 times bonus. Or at least all the money that would be wasted without this fix.

        Or is the world unfair and are developers nowadays just cogs in a capitalistic machine?

      • abbadon420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 day ago

        And they are right to do so. In the grand scheme of things, it doesn’t really matter how much time you spend on a problem. It’s the result that matters. I remember a meme where a dev would place a “wait” function in a new feature. Than remove the wait call and call it a free update and get lots of praise from the customer.

      • mamotromico@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean, it’s still really impressive upgrade even if technically it was a simple change, they are right to make a fuss about the change