Introducing stronger dependencies on systemd – Adrian's blog
blogs.gnome.org
PSA for systemd-free distros about work they'll need to do to continue running GNOME
  • Dark Arc@pie.packetloss.ggEnglish
    81·
    3 days ago

    Yeah, I generally agree; I’m a big fan of systemd on Linux.

    However, on BSD this does sound unfortunately likely to be painful.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      4·
      3 days ago

      Anyone developing desktop for BSD will likely just gravitate to xfce or similar I bet. I honestly am not sure what ghostbsd or midnight or others package by default now.

      • Dark Arc@pie.packetloss.ggEnglish
        3·
        3 days ago

        I’m not either, I’ve never even ran a BSD desktop… But I support the BSD desktop existing and wish it well.

    • esa@discuss.tchncs.de
      3·
      3 days ago

      I’ve heard of the year of Linux on the desktop, but I’ve never really heard of the year of BSD on the desktop. Apart from OSX, maybe.

      I guess this is the kind of stuff POSIX could’ve helped with, but it seems to be busy mandating buggy behaviour.