The following gif demonstrates folding:

  • spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If you don’t want to go the Emacs or Vim routes, try Kate. Neovim is amazing but Kate is too from what I hear. Similar support for LSPs.

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Will probably get airstriked for this, but Zed is also a option.

    Also, if you’re using GNOME, then try GNOME builder. And if you’re using KDE, then try KDevelop or Kate.

    • TerHu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      i’ve heard that some people love using kate because, with some plugins, it really can do all most people need. i’ve seen a dude make a video on it but would need some time to find it again if there was any interest.

    • pbg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      tbf, i love zed and using it for big stuff and neovim for basic scripts is the perfect balance for me

  • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Others have given you many options, but I would like to know why Nvim or Emacs are not good options for you?

    • HayadSont@discuss.onlineOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I have to agree with the positivism surrounding Kate. It has been the only one (together with KDevelop) out of the 5 text editors I’ve installed and tested since yesterday that actually did what I desired from it. Props to the devs! Let’s see if it can dethrone Emacs 😜.

      • callcc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Emacs will always be abe to do things you can’t do with other editors. It’s a text based interface toolkit that happens to also have a good text editor and IDE capability. Buuut, you need to spend a lot of time to set things up. I use it since probably more than 20 years and I still often need to look up and learn stuff. If you want a tool and not a workshop, get a simpler editor.

  • flubba86@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    On windows: Notepad++. On Linux-based OS: Kate. And there’s also JetBrains Fleet, that is jetbrains answer to vscode.

    • HayadSont@discuss.onlineOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Thank you!

      I tested Notepad Next, which seems to be Notepad++’ cross-platform alternative. However, I wasn’t able to get the folding functionality on a Markdown file. Am I doing something wrong?

      I’ve tried Kate since yesterday, it has been one of the better ones for now.

      JetBrains Fleet seems like a cool project. But I’ll probably wait until it’s open sourced. Thanks anyways!

  • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    There’s also Zed. And helix.

    Amongst all the other great alts here

    Also neovim is really dope! Just have to throw that there

    • HayadSont@discuss.onlineOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s also Zed.

      Noted. Thank you!

      And helix.

      I believe this doesn’t have folding (yet). Unfortunately.

      Also neovim is really dope! Just have to throw that there

      xD , Neovim is definitely pretty cool.

      • RageLtd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I use Zed as my primary editor these days. It’s just about ready for prime time!

        (Source: 12 years of web and Linux hacking)

        • HayadSont@discuss.onlineOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Thank you for the clarification!

          While I didn’t mention it explicitly in the post, I do intend to stick to open source.

          • winety@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Sublime Text is not open-source but it has a sane price and a WinRAR-style trial. I use it because it feels a lot snappier than other editors/IDEs I’ve tried when browsing large files.

            On the one hand, it’s a shame that it’s not open-source, but on the other hand, developers have to make a living from something.

            • utopiah@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              On the one hand, it’s a shame that it’s not open-source, but on the other hand, developers have to make a living from something.

              I’m pretty sure most people here, at least I hope, who use open source and free software directly money donate to developers. I know of plenty of developers who do get paid writing open source through such donations or via funding, e.g. NLNet or grants. Maybe I’m misunderstanding your statement, are you saying Sublime Text isn’t open source because they believe those ways are not appropriate for them?

            • HayadSont@discuss.onlineOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              I use it because it feels a lot snappier than other editors/IDEs I’ve tried when browsing large files.

              Snappiness is definitely something I appreciate. So, if it blows everything else out of the water in this respect, that I might have to concede. Thank you for mentioning this particular aspect of it!

              On the one hand, it’s a shame that it’s not open-source, but on the other hand, developers have to make a living from something.

              I wholeheartedly agree. But, I prefer the capability to donate to the open-source software developers that I love to support.

              • utopiah@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                I wholeheartedly agree. But, I prefer the capability to donate to the open-source software developers that I love to support.

                Right indeed, not sure why it was implied that open source software couldn’t be a financially viable option for developers too.

    • HayadSont@discuss.onlineOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Interesting. First time reading about it*. Were it not for you, this might have been completely off the radar. So thank you for mentioning it!

      But I’d guess that for most tasks, Emacs org-mode is the most powerful option.

      Yeah, it has been slowly growing on me 😜. But I would like to explore all other options before I fully commit.

      • mina86@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, it has been slowly growing on me 😜. But I would like to explore all other options before I fully commit.

        You’ve already discovered the best editor. There’s no need to explore more. ;)

        • HayadSont@discuss.onlineOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You’ve already discovered the best editor. There’s no need to explore more. ;)

          Hehe 😜. Perhaps the purpose of this exploration is to cement the idea that I’m already on the best 😂. We’ll see 😉.