• nintendiator@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nothing in any of those three words precludes payment (it’s work after all) but it’s still notoriously scummy. A donation jar would make far more sense.

      • Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        “Fan”

        That’s the part that precludes payment. Fan works legally have to be free, that’s what makes it not copyright infringement.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I should clarify it depends on your definition of fan. When you’re making a derivative work, there’s two versions. There’s fan which is The person is enthusiastic about the content and then there is the intellectual property variation of it, which is someone who is doing it for non-commercial reasons under fair use(or said countries equivalent). However, once you start requiring money for said process, it removes the protections the creator has shielding it and generally changes the definition to that version.

        Additionally, I agree a donation jar would be much better, but even then it’s been shown that that doesn’t resolve all liability because fan projects have been taken down for having a donation button even though the project itself is free, heck projects have been taken down for having advertisements on the projects website despite having nothing to do with said project