What about a modular software, a base version and the modules are paid ? It would maybe avoid ramification? And the user would have more freedom.
- 1 Post
- 7 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
Cake day: March 9th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
3·10 hours agoDid you check the temperature of the cpu and gpu? It might be a overheating problem that causes the fps drops.
Cloud services or features monetization are interesting, I’ve seen some companies do a community or a local version and the business version with more features.
I prefer AUR packages, but it depends on how many AUR dependencies it uses and how well maintained and used by others it is, I rely mainly on the official repo and try to use AUR and others in a complementary way, I also don’t run any AppImages, just the ones from open-source applications and that I trust minimally.
Why do you consider AppImages as last resort?
I can understand that in a distro the main repo need to be prioritized to avoid bloat of repetitive dependencies that could happen with a lot of AppImages.
I can’t understand why so many people are opposed to it as an supportive role from a practical and complementary perspective.
Canonical sure know how to name them.
I always imagined some sort of IP royalty, like you have an idea and implement it, then if someone build something over it for profit they need to pay a fixed percentage otherwise it would be free to use basically.