I disagree.
Despite disagreeing, I appreciate that you used your words. Thanks.
I suggest browsing the apps available here:
Edit: I have no idea who would downvote this or why, but doing so is not helpful to anyone, in any way. If you have a question or concern, please just write it in a comment.
The environment looks real enough. The “cats” look like weird demon creatures created by some entity that only knows dogs.
Congratulations!
For those who didn’t notice that OP posted 2 links:
(They look like a single link because there’s nothing separating them.)
https://store.steampowered.com/app/2021600/Game_Over__A_Musical_RPG/
Its an actual term
It’s a phrase coined very recently based on a misconception, and happened to be picked up by some online publishers. That’s all.
Saying “its an actual term” [sic] just attempts to give it an air of legitimacy, without actually meaning anything.
The phrase itself is not only ignorant, but also insulting. The gamers it refers to are not Baby Boomers, but Generation X, which had nothing to do with the damage to society that Boomers are famous for and most of us in younger generations are suffering from now. (Housing crisis and out-of-touch legislators, for example.)
A game category made up by people who think “boomer” means “anyone more than a few years older than me”.
It was a few years ago when I read Signal’s statement about this, so I’m afraid I don’t have a link for you.
I believe you when you say Molly functions, but it’s important to note that without Signal’s blessing, anyone using Molly can be locked out of the network (and their chats and contacts) at any moment. It’s not the same as official interoperability.
I wonder if the Digital Markets Act will eventually force it.
Unless Signal’s policies recently changed, Molly is not interoperable, since Signal does not allow third-party clients to use their servers/network. That would make point 2 correct.
If that policy has changed, then someone please link the announcement so I can update my notes.
Okay so did they go viral or are they just popular in this one small town? Word mean things
Pedantic is a word.
Also, your criticism of the author’s words would have carried more weight if you had pluralized correctly.
Not much of a trailer, but I think it qualifies as a teaser.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=apt+3.0
Edit for those who couldn’t be bothered to click through the first result:
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/blob/main/debian/changelog
Have you considered making a Linux virtual machine now, and learning small things a few minutes at a time between other tasks? That ought to give you a head start when it comes time to commit.
Then you purchased a wrong game
Perhaps.
But you’ve made a lot of assumptions in your comment, and you’re mistaken about most of them.
I played the side quests. Many came with a good backstory, but that is not gameplay. Nearly all were copy/paste instances from a small pool of tedious tasks. There were a few memorable exceptions, but very few.
I explored the world, as much as one can “explore” something that is fully labeled with point-of-interest markers. They lead the player to a repetitive handful of uninspired encounters, cloned over and over again.
It has plenty of other flaws as well. If you loved it, then I’m happy for you, but I found the gameplay boring.
The strengths I found in The Witcher 3 were its story, lore, characters, and Gwent. Not its gameplay.
Meanwhile, Gwent is a surprisingly well-designed strategy game. So much so that it ended up spun off into a stand-alone version (although I don’t know how good the spinoff is).
To each their own, I suppose.
An argument could be made that Gwent offers better gameplay than the larger game in which it resides.
These are the three that the article refers to: