I am technically challenged, so I am asking for help with this setup

hey guys - can you give me some feedback on this setup?

AMD Ryzen 9950X3D DDR5 ram 16GB (6000mhz) 2TB SSD nvme ASROCK B650M pro RS AM5 4xDDR5 PSU 850W

I count on using my old GTX1070 card on it, until the GPU market settles down a bit.

I like gaming, but also use my PC for image, poster and video editing. Would maybe also like to stream at some point. At the moment i use 2 screens at 1080 but wouldn’t mind upgrating those too at some point.

Any thoughts on the actual setup and compatibility to linux?

The guy i am in talks with, in regards to this, has suggested savings by changing the CPU:

9950x (10% lower price)
9900X3D (10% lower price)
9800X3D (17% lower price)
9900x (25% lower price)

What would you suggest?

EDIT: thanks for the help folks! I went with 9900X. Also, it turns out that it has double the RAM. it is 2x16gb. I think it should work alright for me.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Honestly, the difference these days between CPU models in performance for single-threaded stuff, which is the bottleneck for most everything aside from some games that will use all threads, just isn’t all that high.

    I tend to get high end CPUs these days because the CPU market isn’t advancing all that quickly in performance these days either, so you’re not buying something that you need to replace in short order. But you gotta consider what the tradeoff is.

    The highest end CPU there is the 9950X3D. The lowest end CPU is the 9900X.

    https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/6549vs6171/AMD-Ryzen-9-9950X3D-vs-AMD-Ryzen-9-9900X

    You say that the 9900X costs 25% less.

    In the above benchmark, it performs 1.1% worse in single-threaded performance, and 22.2% worse in a multithreaded performance — this is a synthetic test that ties up all cores.

    If you’re, say, web-browsing or doing the great majority of tasks, you’re probably going to be a lot closer to being bound by the single-threaded difference – you aren’t likely to be saturating all cores.

    Even most games won’t tie up all cores.

    If you’re doing video editing, that might.

    But the difference just isn’t all that large for most things. Unless you intend to be doing a great deal of the few things that’ll actually tie up all your cores, the CPUs will probably perform about the same. If the cost difference is important to you, probably won’t much hurt to go with the less expensive CPU.

  • clubb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, with that kind of CPU, I’d reccomend 32GB of RAM, as 16 feels a little weak for such a chip.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thanks! It turns out that it already did have two of those ram blocks. I just didn’t realize! But in the end, i went with 9900X. It should be more than enough for me

  • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If you’re earning money from the aforementioned editing, you can justify the absolute best CPU money can buy, though a 10% cheaper 9950X will match it. When it comes to gaming, it’s so far beyond any imaginable performance requirement, you legitimately might never need to buy another CPU again, and in this it is matched by the 17% cheaper 9800X3D.

    If I were you, and assuming you make money from editing, I’d save the couple hundred bucks and get the 9950X (non3D) because there are very, VERY, limited real-world scenarios in which the 3D variant will outperform the non3D (gaming or otherwise)

  • voracitude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m very, very happy with the 9800X3D, so you can save yourself a bit of cash there to put towards the GPU. With a fast modern CPU like that, you might even consider an Intel B580 to relieve that GPU bottleneck.

    • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The 9800X3D also has the advantage of only having one CCD on the die, which means it will always use the 3D VCache. The higher core count chips sometimes have issues where games and such might run some threads on the wrong core and not get to take advantage of the huge cache.

      That’s why it tends to be the preferred gaming pick, not just the lower price or the fact that games seldom will use more than 16 threads (which is how many the 9800 series give you)

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thanks! I went with 9900X. It should be just fine for me, considering the replies from in here. Huge help thanks!