I’ve used proton for a year or two now and it is fine. Great for use on my phone when I want to use public/airport wifi and it sort of kind of works with gluetun (the rotating port is annoying but it still is a forwarded port).

But I’ve increasingly been annoyed with Proton as a company and am looking to migrate my email/domain to fastmail in the very near future. I COULD continue to just pay for the vpn (60 USD a year is pretty reasonable) but also feel like this is a good opportunity to “shop around”

Checked the wiki and other FAQs (which all basically crib from said wiki) and they all basically boil down to proton or mullivad… except that mullivad apparently stopped allowing port forwarding which is a bit of an issue for any torrents and the like.

So are there any other good options?

Thanks

  • matey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    What’s going on with Proton the company?

    Edit: ah fuck, thanks for the replies. Sigh.

  • Droolio@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Still using Private Internet Access (PIA).

    Honestly, dunno why they’ve fallen out of fashion due to the FUD about being owned by an unsavoury parent company, but the most important matter to me is if they keep logs, which they don’t. One of the few VPN companies tested on this, in court, and in a recent audit. Plus still extremely cheap (if you go for 3yr+3mo).

    Port forwarding works with with this docker NAS stack. Doesn’t use gluetun, but there’s a specialised docker-wireguard-pia container as part of the stack, with a script that handles port changes. Been flawless.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not a VPN, but you may also want to look into I2P.

    https://i2pd.website/

    https://proprivacy.com/privacy-service/guides/i2p-guide

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=FNp0TRDG0BQ

    Basically, a p2p protocol for the entire internet.

    Its considerably more complicated to set up than most modern VPNs, where nowaday’s its usually as simple as install an app with a GUI, verify some settings and you’re good to go, and i2p is also quite slow…

    … but its totally free, and you can torrent over it, and as far as I know, if you’ve set it up properly, it is basically undetectable by ISPs, due to how it uses ‘garlic’ routing: basically, a whole bunch of users net requests are encrypted, anonymized, and then smashed into a big packet… so an ISP would have to untangle all of that for every packet, and afaik, none of them have figured out how.

    I2P would obviously be horrible for watching streaming content though, snail speed.

    • quack@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Good choice for privacy, not so much for piracy. They removed their port forwarding feature a while ago.

      • TauZero@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        IMHO if you don’t have a globally-reachable address or forwarded port, you are not really a participant of the internet, you are just a receptacle xD

        One service I never see mentioned is OVPN. They have a 1-to-1 feature parity with mullvad and were an easy drop-in replacement when mullvad closed their ports:

        • wireguard
        • port forwarding
        • no usernames/emails/registration, only account numbers
        • crypto payments/cash in the mail
        • same price as mullvad
        • multiple device keys
        • multihop
        • no bandwidth limits
        • setup guides
        • status dashboard

        I used mullvad for years, sad to see them go, and all my scripts basically worked without any change other than the server addresses/public keys. Only downside is they don’t have as many users so not as many servers. I wish more people would join up so I get more IPs to choose from :D

        • yardratianSoma@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Damn, if this is all true, I’ll switch once my credits run out with mullvad. If I don’t like it, I can always switch back, but port forwarding is more than just something to help with seeding, tad shame mullvad pulled the plug on it.

    • Eyro Elloyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Mullvad is so great in a vacuum, but it seems like every other website has you writing out a captcha or blocking you outright exclusively because you’re on mullvad.

        • Trihilis@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve decided I’m not using websites that block mullvad anymore. I’m talking about a hard block like reddit does and not a captcha (captcha is fine by me).

          If they’re doing that much trouble to prevent me from using a VPN they must me doing some pretty shady shit with my data.

          I will not move to another VPN because of all VPNs I feel Mullvad respects my privacy most.

      • 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I have no opinion of them, but I’m curious why advertising would imply untrustworthiness. Are you saying they’re too eager or something? Spending money on ads is also consistent with a company that’s making money by charging for a service — I’d be more suspicious of free VPNs.

        • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The number of leads youtube/podcast advertising generates is not that impressive, the number of leads that become buyers is even less impressive. When a company spends too much on this type of advertising for a product that is not “premium”(meaning overpriced shit), it casts a shadow of doubt on where they get their revenue.

        • Abnorc@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          My experience with products that lean so heavily into the sponsors is that they’re usually mediocre in terms of your overall choices. Basically, the ads kind of give me bad vibes. I admit, it’s not a rational judgment, but I won’t go out of my way to find out if NordVPN is actually good when there are alternatives.

          If many people feel the same way, it may be evidence that sponsors are an outdated method of advertising.

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The requirement for port forwarding narrows that down to AirVPN and Windscribe, which is an unfortunately small set of choices.

        • kbal@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Port forwarding lets you connect with other hosts peer-to-peer which a VPN would otherwise block if both sides are behind one. For torrents you’d get more peers (which doesn’t matter if you’re just downloading the latest and most popular stuff) and be able to seed more effectively.

  • land@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you mainly do torrenting, AirVPN is a good option. I have recently moved away from ProtonVPN; it’s too expensive.

  • zedgeist@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Just throwing in another voice for PIA. Their corporate owners may be questionable, but I’ve been with them since before they sold out and have never heard a peep from my ISP for seeding terabytes of torrents. They don’t keep logs, and they are audited to prove it regularly.

    EDIT: They also have port forwarding, but not for every exit server.

    • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      PIA is such a weird one. They’re massive and know what they’re doing but ownership and jurisdiction have always been questionable. I have long suspected they cooperate with GHCQ but only on legitimate national security cases not piracy.

      • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Does anyone have a good reason to go with PIA when there are others that offer a comparable service without these problems?

  • marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Mullvad, IVPN and Nym (not tested with audits yet, do not trust as much as the other two).

    For clearnet browsing. PIA, AirVPN and Windscribe for torrenting. Windscribe and PIA are probably good for either but this is my classification, take it as you will