I often see Rust mentioned at the same time as MIT-type licenses.

Is it just a cultural thing that people who write Rust dislike Libre copyleft licenses? Or is it baked in to the language somehow?

Edit: It has been pointed out that I meant to say “copyleft”, not “libre”, so edited the title and body likewise.

  • enemenemu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    You could say that, yes.

    It makes sense to suggest MIT license for a MIT project

    MIT is better than proprietary. MIT does not force you to not make your project free.