A build is reproducible if given the same source code, build environment and build instructions, and metadata from the build artifacts, any party can recreate copies of the artifacts that are identical except for the signatures and parts of metadata.
The reason Fedora is pursuing a different definition of reproducible build is that it cannot achieve ““bit-by-bit”” reproducibility by the original definition.
It’s so easy to use
Just use distrobox for aur. Nowadays I use nix pkg manager for everything that’s not available
Neither does fedora
Let’s hope they are successfull and let others migrate as well. The more migrate, the less likelier a failure is
bundling matrix and email would be cool
It says
Codeberg is a non-profit, community-led effort that provides Git hosting and other services for free and open source projects.
Unfortunately, the article does not write about how people use it.
I use it to skip reading docs. Either it works, or I read the docs, sometimes in parallel, whatever is faster.
Oftentimes I just forgot how some function is called.
I’m still in the testing phase and in more than 50% of the cases its crap. Halizination is a real problem with those models that I’ve used.
You could say that, yes.
It makes sense to suggest MIT license for a MIT project
MIT is better than proprietary. MIT does not force you to not make your project free.
It’s kind of the default in the docs
SPDX license expressions support AND and OR operators to combine multiple licenses.1
[package]
# ...
license = "MIT OR Apache-2.0"
Using OR indicates the user may choose either license. Using AND indicates the user must comply with both licenses simultaneously. The WITH operator indicates a license with a special exception. Some examples:
MIT OR Apache-2.0
LGPL-2.1-only AND MIT AND BSD-2-Clause
GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Bison-exception-2.2
When I started out (I don’t write Rust but other languages), in my first years, I liked gpl and after a couple of years I got to know MIT and I started using that because I thought it is “more free”. I wasn’t aware of the consequences immediately. Once I read the GNU philosophy and started reading more about free software, I started using gplv3 again
As much as I like fedora, I’m on the suse side.
It should be based on suse because it is european. EU wants to push european it solutions. Fedora would be better than microsoft but it is both linux after all. Both can use kde and gnome. They are not so much different.
Moreover, BSI, Secunet and others already work with suse.
Edit: I should install opensuse myself to put my money where my mouth is. The difference between fedora and opensuse isn’t too big for me anyway.
Are there suse based distros, like ublue? https:// osinside.github.io/kiwi/overview.html