I often see Rust mentioned at the same time as MIT-type licenses.

Is it just a cultural thing that people who write Rust dislike Libre copyleft licenses? Or is it baked in to the language somehow?

Edit: It has been pointed out that I meant to say “copyleft”, not “libre”, so edited the title and body likewise.

    • enemenemu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      You could say that, yes.

      It makes sense to suggest MIT license for a MIT project

      MIT is better than proprietary. MIT does not force you to not make your project free.